GPT Daybreak Blue vs Deepseek V4 Flash pricing
Side-by-side token pricing for GPT Daybreak Blue (OpenAI) and Deepseek V4 Flash (DeepSeek), plus the total cost at three workload sizes so the crossover point is obvious. Prices refreshed 2026-09-13 13:40 UTC.
| Metric | GPT Daybreak Blue | Deepseek V4 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/1M tokens | $4 | $0.3 |
| Output $/1M tokens | $20 | $1.2 |
| Cached input $/1M | $0.4 | $0.006 |
| Context window | 1.1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 393K |
| Vision | yes | yes |
| Tool calling | yes | yes |
| Cache pricing | yes | yes |
Total cost by workload
| Workload | GPT Daybreak Blue | Deepseek V4 Flash | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1M tokens in · 300K out | $10 | $0.66 | Deepseek V4 Flash (93% less) |
| 10M tokens in · 3M out | $100 | $6.6 | Deepseek V4 Flash (93% less) |
| 100M tokens in · 30M out | $1000 | $66 | Deepseek V4 Flash (93% less) |
On blended cost (weighted 3:1 toward input), Deepseek V4 Flash comes out cheaper by roughly 93% on input pricing. Pick Deepseek V4 Flash when the workload is price-sensitive and its context window covers your prompts; GPT Daybreak Blue is the one to benchmark if you need vision, reasoning depth, or a different quality profile.
Frequently asked
› Is GPT Daybreak Blue cheaper than Deepseek V4 Flash?
On input pricing, Deepseek V4 Flash is cheaper ($0.3 vs $4 per 1M tokens). On blended cost the winner is Deepseek V4 Flash, because output tokens are weighted differently for most workloads.
› Which has the larger context window?
GPT Daybreak Blue offers the larger context (1.1M tokens).
› Do these prices include prompt caching?
Cached input is priced separately where a provider publishes a cache rate; the table above lists it per model so the comparison stays like-for-like.