Price per 1M logo

Cheapest model for summarisation at scale

Ranked for an input-heavy workload (long documents, short summaries), where output tokens matter far less than input.

Current leader: Gemini Exp 1114 (Google Gemini). Refreshed 2026-10-28 12:57 UTC.

#ModelProviderInput $/1MOutput $/1MCached $/1MContext
1Gemini Exp 1114Google Geminifreefree—1.0M
2Gemini Exp 1206Google Geminifreefree—2.1M
3Gemma 3 27b ItGoogle Geminifreefree—131K
4Gemma 4 26b A4b ItGoogle Geminifreefree—262K
5Gemma 4 31b ItGoogle Geminifreefree—262K
6Labs Leanstral 1 5Mistral AIfreefree—262K
7Labs Leanstral 1 5 1Mistral AIfreefree—262K
8Deepseek V3.1:671b CloudOllamafreefree—164K
9GPT Oss:120b CloudOllamafreefree—131K
10GPT Oss:20b CloudOllamafreefree—131K
11Qwen3 Coder:480b CloudOllamafreefree—262K
12Ternary Bonsai 27BTogether AIfreefree—262K
13Llama 3.2 3B InstructDeepInfra$0.02$0.02—131K
14Llama 3.2 1b InstructNovita AI$0.02$0.02—131K
15Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407DeepInfra$0.019$0.03—131K
16Meta Llama 3.1 8B Instruct TurboDeepInfra$0.02$0.04—131K
17Llama Guard 3 8BNebius$0.02$0.06—128K
18Meta Llama 3.1 8B InstructNebius$0.02$0.06—128K
19Qwen2 VL 7B InstructNebius$0.02$0.06—131K
20Granite 4.0 H MicroCloudflare Workers AI$0.017$0.112—131K
21Gemma 4 E4B ItDeepInfra$0.02$0.1—131K
22Qwen3 4b Fp8Novita AI$0.03$0.03—128K
23Meta Llama 3.1 8B InstructDeepInfra$0.03$0.05—131K
24GPT Oss 20bDeepInfra$0.03$0.14—131K
25Qwen3 8b Fp8Novita AI$0.035$0.138—128K
26Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407Nebius$0.04$0.12—128K
27Llama 3.2 11B Vision InstructDeepInfra$0.049$0.049—131K
28GPT Oss 120bDeepInfra$0.037$0.17—131K
29GPT Oss 20bNovita AI$0.04$0.15—131K
30NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2DeepInfra$0.04$0.16—131K
31Llama Guard 3 8BDeepInfra$0.055$0.055—131K
32Gemma 3 4b ItDeepInfra$0.05$0.1—131K
33Gemma 3 12b ItNovita AI$0.05$0.1—131K
34Amazon.nova Micro V1:0Amazon Bedrock$0.042$0.168$0.011128K
35Trinity MiniTogether AI$0.045$0.15—128K
36Llama 3.2 1B InstructTogether AI$0.06$0.06—131K
37Llama 3.2 3B InstructTogether AI$0.06$0.06—131K
38Gemma 3 12b ItDeepInfra$0.05$0.15—131K
39Deepseek R1 0528 Qwen3 8bNovita AI$0.06$0.09—128K
40Qwen TurboAlibaba DashScope$0.05$0.2—129K
41Qwen TurboAlibaba DashScope$0.05$0.2—1M
42Qwen TurboAlibaba DashScope$0.05$0.2—1M
43Qwen TurboAlibaba DashScope$0.05$0.2—1M
44Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BDeepInfra$0.05$0.2$0.025262K
45Nemotron Lightning 3p5 30b A3bFireworks AI$0.05$0.2$0.01262K
46Nemotron 3 Nano 30b A3bNovita AI$0.05$0.2—262K
47GPT Oss 20bTogether AI$0.05$0.2—131K
48Baichuan M2 32bNovita AI$0.07$0.07—131K
49GPT Oss 120bNovita AI$0.05$0.25—131K
50Ling 3.0 FlashDeepInfra$0.06$0.18$0.012131K
51Ling 3.0 Flash FastNovita AI$0.06$0.18$0.012262K
52Ling 3.0 FlashNovita AI$0.06$0.18$0.012262K
53Qwen2.5 32B InstructNebius$0.06$0.2—128K
54NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BNebius$0.06$0.24—262K
55Nemotron 3 Nano OmniNebius$0.06$0.24—262K
56Nemotron 3 5 LightningNebius$0.06$0.24—1.0M
57NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2Together AI$0.06$0.25—131K
58Databricks GPT 5 NanoDatabricks$0.05$0.4$0.005272K
59GPT 5 NanoOpenAI$0.05$0.4$0.005272K
60GPT 5 NanoOpenAI$0.05$0.4$0.005272K

Other use cases

Frequently asked

› What is the cheapest model for summarising thousands of documents?

Gemini Exp 1114 from Google Gemini currently leads this list, at $0/1M input tokens. Rankings are recomputed from the raw dataset on every refresh, so they track price cuts automatically.

› How are these rankings calculated?

Each use case applies a capability filter (context size, vision, tool calling, cache pricing) and then ranks the surviving models by the blended cost that profile actually pays. See the methodology page for the exact formulas.

› Is the cheapest model always the right choice?

No. Check the capability flags and context window, and benchmark quality on your own data — the cheapest model that fails your evals costs more than the second cheapest that passes them.